Subscribe

Your email:

Download our free eBook

Internet Marketing Strategy

Learn how you can improve your website's performance using these simple techniques.

Internet Marketing Blog of KeChange

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

What's the Google Buzz? Tell me what's happenin'

  | Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on Facebook Facebook | Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon |  Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn | Submit to Reddit reddit 

Social Media BubbleArticle submitted by SJ Petteuti.

So now Google is jumping into the social media sphere with Google Buzz. Fantastic. Just what we need, one more profile to manage and keep up with. Did you know that the average social media user has 8 different profiles to manage?  Now with a Google Buzz account will that number jump to 9? Will I have to manage my Google Buzz account and my Google Wave account separately? 

With all these companies reinventing the wheel comes what I believe is the precipice of the Social Media Bubble. And when (not if) it bursts it will be because of companies like Google who are trying to stick their fingers in too many pies.

All bubbles, no matter what industry, burst because of the same reason- overload. People can only handle interacting with so many social media sites, and in the end the only thing that makes a social media site valuable is if it provides some sort of unique value. If I want to review a movie I go to Netflix, if I need to reach out to a professional contact I'll use Linkedin. Redundant social media sites like Google Buzz (which essentially aggregates the features of Twitter into a gmail social circle) will provide a small value, and ultimately remain unsuccessful.

The same is true for companies who are developing an Internet Marketing campaign. It is a fad right now to be on all the popular social media sites- you know the usual suspects. But having a social media presence can become a liability if you are not providing some sort of unique value to a specific audience on a specific social media platform. For all of our clients, we make sure that they have a seperate strategy for their Facebook page, Twitter account, and any other social media profile that we create for them- because they each serve very different functions. 

But there is a limit, we can only manage so many accounts, both as companies and individuals. So when companies (like Google and Facebook) try to "add value" by rebranding something (like real-time chat) that we already have, they run the risk of overloading our circuits, and shutting down our interest in social media entirely.

Don't believe me? Consider the TV show Lost. Lost did such a good job interweaving the plot throughout each episode that they create a mentality that unless you have seen every episode (in order) then it's not even worth trying to jump in now. And sadly, that's true. That is a major reason why until recently, the ratings for Lost have consistently declined, despite the fact that the show is still strong. People lose interest, and new viewers don't jump in.

As the vanguards of the digital media, we need to be wary of not falling into that same trap.  We can avoid bursting the bubble if we recognize that social media platforms work best when they are unique, and that there is a limit to how many profiles we can successfully manage.

The solution to companies is simple, don't get into a social media platform unless you can contribute something that is currently not there. That lesson goes for Google as well. 

W4Y5TG8U64C6

Comments

Google Buzz = FriendFeed 2.0 
 
I never really used that site besides pulling the RSS feed for the aggregate of my engagement in other places... I'll probably just do the same with this.  
 
I think you make a good point here, but you are also neglecting Google and their market share. <strong>Is it not in Google's best interest to pop the bubble?</strong> The reason Google wants/needs to buy Twitter is because real time search has the ability to significantly dent Google's dominance in Search. Same for Facebook/LinkedIn and their search of personal information.
Posted @ Thursday, February 11, 2010 6:53 PM by Kyle James
Always great to hear from the esteemable Kyle James, but I would argue that real time search and search engines are two different animals, and the ability of social media platforms like Twitter to function as a competitor to search engines is unlikely
Posted @ Friday, February 12, 2010 9:05 AM by SJ Petteruti
I agree with Kyle that Google Buzz is Friendfeed (a service now owned by Facebook). I also agree that social media overload is a part of the bubble. Is it in Google's interest to pup it and get back to search? That's a good question. I do know that some of my colleague's are watching Google's investment in social search (think FourSquare) and how GPS Mobile's can be turned social and useful.  
 
It will be fun to watch.
Posted @ Friday, February 12, 2010 3:11 PM by Matt Hames
I agree with Kyle that Google Buzz is Friendfeed (a service now owned by Facebook). I also agree that social media overload is a part of the bubble. Is it in Google's interest to pup it and get back to search? That's a good question. I do know that some of my colleague's are watching Google's investment in social search (think FourSquare) and how GPS Mobile's can be turned social and useful.  
 
It will be fun to watch.
Posted @ Friday, February 12, 2010 3:29 PM by Matt Hames
"Did you know that the average social media user has 8 different profiles to manage?" 
 
I don't think the article you linked to said that. I think the interviewee said that among the users of his social media aggregator, females had an average of 10 sites and males "half that much". 
 
That's people who are on so many sites they feel a need to use his aggregator, not all social media users.
Posted @ Monday, February 15, 2010 1:06 PM by Anonymous
With all do respect I must disagree with you. Ill start with Buzz and finish with Lost.  
 
Buzz isn't a redundant social network. The problem buzz is facing is that everyone thinks it's something that it's not. The comparison is easy Buzz is this (insert social network) or Buzz is that ... 2.0 .. but what if Buzz is something totally different. If it is different than it means its 1 more network "experts" must figure out.  
 
The future of social media planning is going to be selecting the correct networks to engage with rather than the big ones. Segmentation is already happening and will continue to happen as networks hit the market, and we must adapt to these changes. The golden age of Social Media planning is over, now it gets hard. 
 
To understand why Buzz is valid, and why its not going to go down you need to look at Google's objective. I might be wrong but I think I have it figured out pretty well <a>http://bit.ly/cfM5ql  
 
Lost has a different set of problems... Abrams and Co wanted to end the show in 3 or 4 seasons; ABC not so much. Their solution was take a handful of episodes and stretch them into full seasons. That equaled less viewership because nothing ever resolved and the plot stopped moving. Last season an end date was announced and the show started to get traction again. This season is the last season so it has huge traction!
Posted @ Wednesday, February 24, 2010 2:16 PM by Mike Handy
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics